Quadrupling Down After Bryan Kohberger's Plea Deal
Like dominoes, Bryan Kohberger’s die hard supporters have flunked the latest shit test. First came the “Amazon purchases” that cut the wheat from the chaff, and now the plea deal, where Bryan Kohberger was compelled to plead guilty to all charges. So many are confused by the plea deal, “He admitted it!”, but that is what a plea deal is:
The traditional image of a criminal trial has become all but obsolete in the American legal system. The overwhelming majority of criminal convictions (over 90 percent) result from plea bargains. Their prevalence has arisen as a matter of necessity for many prosecutors and judges, since the criminal justice system has become overburdened and inefficient.
In a plea bargain, the defendant and the prosecutor reach an agreement in which the defendant pleads guilty or no contest in exchange for concessions by the prosecutor.
In this case, the concession made was no execution, and by a mechanical firing squad. A firing squad! In case anyone is not aware, the European company that manufactures the barbiturate that US states use for death by lethal injection have stopped supplying the USA with their product. Idaho state’s choice of state homicide is a firing squad. Homicide is what the doctor who attends an execution is obliged to write on the death certificate.
Whilst watching the plea deal hearing I was thinking about some of the people that died like flies with the Amazon purchases. Listening to Thompson give the state’s summary of “evidence”, I couldn’t help but wonder, are those flies being reanimated by the blatant lack of evidence the state claims they had.
Taking a plea bargain when innocent may seem unimaginable. It may seem like a miscarriage of justice. And, indeed, it is a miscarriage of justice. No innocent person should ever be placed in a situation where they are convicted of a crime they did not commit. The very idea of it is difficult to stomach. However, there are several compelling real-world reasons why innocent people plead guilty:
One of the primary reasons even an innocent person might consider a plea deal is the fear of facing severe consequences if convicted at trial in state or federal courts. Prosecutors often leverage the possibility of lengthy trial penalty to coerce accused into accepting plea agreements, creating a daunting choice between a potentially long prison term or a seemingly lesser sentence through plea bargaining.
The criminal justice process can be overwhelming, and innocent individuals may find themselves pressured or coerced into taking guilty pleas. The stress of facing trial in a criminal case, coupled with the risk of a criminal conviction if found guilty, may lead some to go for a plea agreement as a way to alleviate immediate stress and obtain a defined, albeit undeserved, resolution.
Distrust in the criminal justice system, concerns about bias, and a perceived inability to get a fair trial can lead innocent individuals to doubt the efficacy of their defense. Faced with scepticism about the system’s ability to deliver justice, some criminal defendants may reluctantly accept a plea deal, viewing it as a compromise to obtain a more predictable outcome of wrongful convictions.
The uncertainty associated with trials, coupled with the inherent risks of jury verdicts, may prompt innocent defendants to adopt a risk-averse approach. Fearful of the potential consequences of a trial gone awry, individuals might choose the certainty of a plea deal over the unpredictability of a courtroom judgment.
When defendants plead guilty, they basically enter into a negotiated agreement with the prosecution. Plea bargain depends on the defendant pleading guilty to a lesser charge or accepting a reduced sentence in exchange for avoiding a jury trial and giving up their trial rights.
A factually innocent defendant might wish to agree to take a plea deal and admit guilt to avoid maximum sentence as per the judicial system. That is something that should almost never happen. But the reality is that innocent people are convicted of crimes they did not commit every single day in America and especially in Arizona, which has some of the very harshest mandatory minimum sentences anywhere in the country. Plea deals are strategic decisions often made to mitigate potential harsher consequences that might result from a criminal trial.
Let’s take a brief sojourn into some of the events that transpired the weeks previous to the plea deal:
Hipplers refusal to the defense’s Motion to bring third party culprits (four names of people that lived near to the house) into trial, stating, “We know the perpetrator used his car to commit the crimes”, (Hippler, huh?). He changed witness statement testimonies in his responses to Motions, he kept referring to the DNA as “the defendant’s DNA”, he hamstringed the defense throughout whilst assisting the prosecution on how to handle their prosecutorial game.
NBC’s Dateline’s mocumentary released, with alleged “leaks” which were a nothingburger. Nevertheless, Judge Hippler ordered an investigation by a special prosecutor to discover who leaked to the presstitutes. Bryan Kohberger’s 6th & 14th Amendment have been violated since his arrest, see Sheppard V Maxwell. A selfie of Bryan Kohberger giving a thumbs up was released, allegedly taken after committing the crime. The selfie is so manipulated to make him look sinister, Draculesque, it beggars belief they think they could get away with it. See: Forensic Analysis of Selfie
The DoorDash Driver: Video footage of Molly McMichael being arrested for DUI in September of 2024 suddenly surfaced on the internet, and footage of another traffic stop by Payne of all people. Her car is not insured, and does an unnecessary name drop, “I’m friends with Bill Thompson” the prosecutor. Payne waves her off to drive without insurance. At the police station for the DUI arrest, Molly says, “Now I’ll have to testify…” at the Kohberger trial. What? If Molly was in fact the DoorDash driver who made a delivery to 1112 King Road for Xana Kernodle’s food order, during the timeframe 4:00am - 4:20am, she would always have had to testify. What an absurdity.
A-nother book on the Idaho Four murders, Bryan dunnit was scheduled to be released.
Amazon Prime documentary on the Idaho Four murders, Bryan dunnit was scheduled to be released on the 17th of July, tying in beautifully with jury selection.
Hippler said at the plea hearing, the court had saved specific dates for jury selection. “10,000 people in one week.” 2,000 potential jury members in one day?
The US Justice system is no longer a trial system.
Defenders also maintain that despite the potentially coercive power placed in prosecutor’s hands, even an innocent defendant is better off when she chooses to plead guilty in order to assure a more lenient result if she concludes that there is a risk of wrongful conviction at trial. 62 By allowing a defendant to choose whether to accept a plea bargain or take her chances at trial, the rational defendant (so the theory goes) will only choose to plead guilty if the chances of being found guilty are high (or process costs are high compared to the costs of a guilty plea).
Therefore, according to this school of thought, even innocent defendants gain from plea bargaining. A further advantage of the plea-bargaining system is said to be respect for an individual’s autonomy in that it gives the defendant some ability to control her destiny.
Bear in mind Bryan Kohberger is a Criminal Justice graduate who was studying for a PhD in Criminology, specialising in Cloud Forensics. The accusation by LE that he not only took his cell phone with him to commit such a heinous crime, but also that he drove there in his own car, is patently absurd.
CAST analysis is a made up science by the FBI (see FBI “Experts” Are Lying to Courts About Cell Phones), and in this case, the FBI only mapped 6% of the data for the CAST report. Moscow LE detective Mowery only mapped 18% of the data for the CAST report = a data deficit of 80% for their probable cause, specifically in the 2am to 6am timeline.
LE's timeline is a contradiction in and of itself: They have 4:25am as their crime end time, but their Suspect Vehicle 1 is back on the road, driving by 4:20am, which is only possible if Suspect Vehicle 1 did not commit the murders. Let’s say that was Bryan Kohberger, that timeline allows roughly 8 minutes to murder four people (Ethan Chapin was a 6ft 2” football player), 2 minutes to exit the house, get back to the car, and back on cameras. That is an incredibly tight window. That is not my theory, that is LE & prosecution’s time frame. The PCA itself gives Suspect Vehicle 1 an alibi at 4:20am by eyes-in-the-sky cameras.
I don't care if Kohberger is guilty or innocent, I don't care about the victims, but I do care that the investigation was sloppy from the outset, that the delay in the 911 call is absolutely inexplicable [search on YT for how young children are that call 911, 4 years old is the youngest], the use of IGG is incomprehensible as it is only really fit for cold cases, the data used to create the CAST report insufficient (see the short linked below on CAST analysis being a junk science made up by the FBI), LE's timeline for the murders defies physics, as does Bryan Kohberger leaving the house without a trace of blood or DNA on him, the video footage of his car is patent misidentification, the house was razed to the ground and buried on the 28th December 2023, 7 months before the trial was scheduled to take place, whilst Bryan Kohberger's Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments were supposed to guarantee due process of law, which includes the right to a fair trial.
The DNA sample (not blood/sweat/semen/saliva) was discovered on the underneath of the brass metal snap button of a KA-BAR knife sheath. However, metals degrade both biological and touch/trace/transfer DNA rapidly, brass being one of the worst offenders giving that particular DNA sample a maximum of 12hrs shelf life (8+hrs had passed before 911 was called, Payne didn't discover the sheath until his 2nd turn of the crime scene circa 4pm =12hrs). The chain of custody for the knife sheath DNA is insane:
King Road → Coeur d'Alene Laboratory → FBI Quantico → Othram in Texas → FBI Quantico
But the identification of the DNA from the Kohberger family home trash, leading to the father of the person whose DNA was allegedly found on the knife sheath, took just one single day. When the knife sheath DNA was sent to Othram, who specialise in IGG to generate the SNP profile and begin to construct a family tree, suddenly LE decided to assign the task back to the FBI who uploaded the DNA profile to genealogy databases, received matches of relatives, constructed a family tree, identified Bryan Kohberger and gave that “tip” to Idaho law enforcement — then deleted the profile from the database, did not memorialise any of their work nor create a report.
See: Against Black-Box Forensics: The Pandora’s Box of Forensic Genetic Genealogy
“There were a couple of other matches. One of them was actually 250 centimorgans, which is something we get excited about in genealogy; and one of them was, I think, was closer to 70 that were not in the Othram report. If Othram had seen the one who shared 250 centimorgans, that would have been in their report. Their genealogists are good, they know what they're doing; they would not have ignored a 250 centimorgan match."
Leah Larkin
Regardless of who ran it, they were 232 picograms short to meet the minimum requirement thresholds to START utilising the testing legally. 400 minimum (200+200) for both, 200 each. 168 picograms is short either minimum and the 6.5 picograms BS is an IGG reach to the moon chance with ZERO usable testing results and damn near worthless to start. 168 picograms was worthless for court to start with.
FBI “Experts” Are Lying to Courts About Cell Phones: